Market Failures: Positive and Negative Externalities
10/28/2016 Jacob Reed
“Externalities” is a term my students often see in some of their early unit tests where they call me over to help them decipher what a question is asking. “Mr. Reed?” the student asks. “What is an externality?”
“What does the question say about them?” I respond.
“It says there are none.”
“That’s all I’ve taught you so far. As far as you know, they don’t exist. We will learn they exist later.”
They most certainly do exist and they are a prime example of market failures.
Read everything below to learn or relearn the basics of positive and negative externalities. When you are done, head to the “Shading Practice” or “Prices, Points, and Quantities” page to get some practice with this. Both of those review games have a few questions on this topic.
What are externalities?
An externality is a cost or benefit to someone other than the producer or consumer. Negative externalities are costs and positive externalities are benefits. Some examples of negative externalities include: second hand smoke (from cigarettes), air pollution (from gasoline), and noise pollution (from concerts). These are all costs that fall on people other than the producer and consumer of that product. Some examples of positive externalities include: nice smell (from a neighborhood cookie factory), herd immunity (from immunizations), and fruit and vegetable production (from bee’s in the production of honey).
A market without externalities
In a market without any externalities the benefits of a product are received by consumers so the demand curve is equal to the marginal benefit (MB) of the product. In this case, since there is no externality, the marginal benefit to consumers (called the marginal private benefit or MPB) is equal to the marginal benefit to society as a whole (called the marginal social benefit or MSB). So the MB, MPB, MSB, and Demand are all equal when there are no externalities.
The costs of a product, when there are no externalities fall on the producers so the supply curve is equal to the marginal cost (MC) of the product. In this case, since there is no externality, the marginal cost to producers (called the marginal private cost or MPC) is equal to the marginal cost to society as a whole (called the marginal social cost or MSC) so the MC, MPC, MSC, and Supply are all equal when there are no externalities.
Correcting for a negative externality
If the government were to impose a per-unit tax (not lump-sum) equal to the external cost of the product, it would shift the supply curve to the left until it equals the MSC curve. The tax would correct for the market failure and the market would now produce the allocatively efficient quantity. So if there is a negative externality, a per-unit tax will reduce deadweight loss.
Note: If the government granted a per-unit subsidy, it would increase deadweight loss and be less efficient.
A market with positive externalities
In a market with positive externalities, the external benefit to society must be added to the marginal private benefit to get the marginal social benefit. As a result, the MSB is higher than the MPB and Demand. The allocatively efficient quantity (what is best for society) is where the Marginal Social Benefit equals the Marginal Social Cost (MSB=MSC). Unfortunately, the unregulated market will produce the quantity where MPC=MPB. Since the market is not allocatively efficient, there is deadweight loss. The deadweight loss is found by making a point at the allocatively efficient point, then finding the true cost and benefit of the unregulated market quantity. Those three points form a triangle of deadweight loss. If you wanted to calculate the deadweight loss, find the area of the triangle using the price and quantity axes (1/2 base x height). Goods with positive externalities cause a market failure because they are under produced and create deadweight loss.
Correcting for a positive externality
When it comes to correcting for a positive externality market failure, there are two common ways to do it; a per-unit (not lump sum) subsidy to the consumer, or a per-unit subsidy to the producer. A per-unit subsidy to the consumer has the effect of shifting the demand curve to the right. If the subsidy is equal to the external benefit, the demand curve will shift right until it equals the MSB curve.
A per-unit subsidy to the producer has the effect of shifting the supply curve to the right. If the subsidy is equal to the external benefit, the supply curve will shift right until it intersects the demand curve at the allocatively efficient quantity.
Either way, a subsidy would correct for the market failure and the market would now produce the allocatively efficient quantity. So if there is a positive externality, a per-unit subsidy will reduce dead weight loss.
Note: If the government imposed a per-unit tax, it would increase deadweight loss and be less efficient.